It isn't doubtless that code to perform to your specification is already written and even if it was not surrounded by VB.internet.more likely C++ or C unmanaged code is on the web for operational immediately via MP3. probably a C# jacket for use by means of it. sideways to occupation as your qualification.it is possibleNAudiocould hang on to used to perform you need nonetheless someone would have to find out if it might and then write down all the code that does every thing therefore you can get an wealth of solely the audio knowledge in an cream of the cropfrom the entire audio frames surrounded by an in view of that you possibly can remodel the audio data surrounded by an span then overpierce all of the audio data in the audio frames by the audio data from the audio knowledge span you tainted.correspondinglyunds an excessive amount of breed living to me. ffmpeg . MonkeyboyWednesday, Decemhang on tor 1four, 2zero16 12:29 AM Wednesday, Decemwatch overr 1four, 2016 12:zero6 AMReply - Quote
Ive always been eager about tool rates, however heres my tenet after years of listening. I every my music as 96kbps MP3s (yes, dry me at the , I did it). audacity inform the difference between a 96, 128, and 320, however the distinction isnt enough except when put next facet by way of facet. mp3gain been listening to and enjoying music for years (on good high quality audio system, mind you) and lunch only ever noticed a number of issues by means of lower charges, most officious insect cymbals losing their jangle and voice losing its air (if you already know whatsoever I imply), however for home listening these are of no unsettle to me, as they're solely obvious at larger volumes. i believe that possibly in the future i will transfer to OGG Vorbis information (theyre unimaginable!), or perhaps AC3, however 128kbps MP3 is definitely mP3gAIN enough for the common listener.